Friday, January 19, 2007

Science Trap


Science has hypnotizing effects. In our time, as everything is becoming much faster paced, many of us are losing our quality of patience. We want to discover solutions and possess materialistic goods with as much immediacy as possible. Our curiosity has further driven us to become possessed by our desire for quick results and science has become our bridge to these answers and objects. The problem is that we often become consumed with the task of delivering results and forget or downplay the consequences that could arise. So instead of discussing the order of theory and experimentation as we did in class, I want to bring up the idea of how scientific results overshadow consequences. Should we be putting more consideration into the possibility of repercussions before we even go about conducting the experiments?

In my opinion, the obvious answer to that question is ‘yes’, but it is often not the case. As shown in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Birthmark, Aylmer is a good representation of our scientific society today. This ‘man of science’ is overwhelmingly possessed by his task of removing a mark that graces his wife’s cheek that he knows no boundaries and devalues the consequences at stake. For Aylmer, the balance between Georgiana’s life vs. beauty falls to the latter of the two. And what hypnotized this scientist “became the central point of all” (Hawthorne 86). He was surprised at what “lengths which he might find in his heart to go for the sake of giving himself peace” (Hawthorne 87). That desire for results took away his rationality and replaced it with blind fervor. The life of his wife was but a necessary sacrifice for the possibility of even the slightest fade in her facial blemish.

Today, I think we are being trapped by our demand for immediate results and are overlooking the consequences that could result. We are so focused on the task at hand that we are in a way hypnotized from reality. If we continue to choose experimentation before contemplating repercussions, then we may find ourselves in Aylmer’s shoes at the end of The Birthmark, trapped by our own stupidity for rashness.

5 Comments:

Blogger Amanda P said...

I completely agree that people in today's world are suffering from a loss of patience. With cell phones, instant messaging ("instant" being the keyword) and other "instant" forms of technology, we have acquired a new level of impatience in all aspects of life, science included. While scientists such as the ones we are studying were willing to work long hours to solve the most minute parts of an experiment in past centuries, we in today's world feel the need to have immediate success and gratification, which is not usually possible in questions of science.

12:10 PM  
Blogger judge said...

I agree that there has been a shift towards the desire for instant gratification, but I am not in agreement that this is a bad change. In the modern world the individual has more power than ever before. The ability to communicate instantly from anywhere in the world, to anywhere else marks a drastic increase in our quality of life, not a decrease as some may argue. To complain about the increase in the speed of our lives would be as if at the dawn of the 20th century individuals bemoaned the introduction of cars because now we could travel faster. Today such an argument would be laughed at because the benefits of the technology are clear. While the instant media is still young, it does provide great benefits to our culture.

12:37 PM  
Blogger turtle soup said...

I also do not think that living in a faster paced world is a bad change. Yes, cell phones and other forms of instant communication have significantly improved our way of living. (it's even enabled us to form better relationships with other nations) And yes, science has led to a lot of new technology that has been beneficial to all of us, but there are some facets of science that has led us to areas that may be somewhat blurry. Blurry in that the side effects may not have been tested thoroughly or thought through completely. I guess a lot of ethical issues are part of this problem of new technology and 'new science,' too. So the science I am sort of trying to target is cloning. But that's a huge issue in itself and I'm sure there are thousands of discussion boards online created just for that specific one.

1:14 AM  
Blogger Malen said...

I think here you could also discuss the ethics of science. Yes, we are trying to find the answers to scientific questions especially with cures to diseases, but at what price. Animal testing has always been an issue, but is it ok if it leads to a cure that could save thousands, even millions of people? Or what about stem cell research, is that ethical even if it could save lives? Science is evolving rapidly with new things being discovered everyday. This is a very positive thing, however that doesn’t mean that the roads leading up to the discoveries are ethical and right.

4:08 AM  
Blogger Chris Rowland said...

I agree with Tifanny. We are moving toward a faster paced world but it's not a bad thing. With all the break throughs we ahave had in travel and communication, people are able to stay in touch with family members across the nation or even around the world. Also, people can travel to places all over the world. 600 years ago it tookk months to travel across the Atlantic, now it doesn't even take a day. These break throughs have brought the world closer together, because now we can communicate easier, share more ideas, and work together more efficiently with people on the other side of the Earth. This unification via communication has enabled people with the similar ideas, who otherwise would never have come in contact with each other, to work together and make their ideas flourish.

4:56 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home