Friday, March 23, 2007

Gemini


‘What was injected into me and my twin sister, Miriam? And for what nefarious purposes were our blood used?’ These are probably the thoughts that have been haunting Eva Mozes Kor for the past half-century according to the NAZI Research article we read for class this week. Josef Mengele was the man behind the studies. He was the man who probed twins as if they were lab rats. And what good has come out of his unethical studies? Have we benefited at all from his work? Or as Britt asked in class, is it even ethical for us to cite his work?

To answer these questions, I think it is important to first have a better understanding of what Mengele did in Auschwitz. In class today, someone mentioned whether or not it was even practical to use any of Mengele’s Nazi research today because many of the experiments were conducted with an Arian superiority bias. How do we even know if these experiments were even scientifically structured and reliable? However, after reading some other research on Mengele and his studies, I learned that he was actually working alongside some of the top researchers of that time.

Also, Mengele treated twins very differently from the other prisons at Auschwitz; they were given chocolates and candy (some of them called him ‘Uncle Mengele’), freed from certain punishments, and even sometimes allowed to play sports (Children of the Flames: Dr. Josef Mengle and the Untold Story of the Twins of Auschwitz). But all this changed once Mengele was ready to experiment on them. This “happy” time also seemed like a waiting room at a Doctor’s office. You get toys and games to play with before you go in to see the Dr.

Once they were called upon for experimentation, they were subjected to probably some of the worst treatment during the Holocaust. Everything he did, however, was a secret to the test subjects. Eva and her sister, Miriam, had no idea what was being done to their bodies and for what purpose they were done. Blood was drawn, chemicals were used, measurements were taken, injections were given, and even death was used in research.

In the end, it is still difficult to decide whether or not it is acceptable to use Nazi research today. If we do decide that this research is unethical to cite, does this mean that the victims of Mengele suffered for no cause? I think the decision is up to the remaining survivors. My guess is that they’ll support its use if there’s anyone who can benefit, but really, how are people today supposed to benefit from this research? What sort of useful information did Mengele come up with that is applicable to medical research in this time and age? If his purpose was hidden from his subjects, then where can we find the answers?

Here are some words from a surviving victim of Josef Mengele:
"Dr. Mengele had always been more interested in Tibi. I am not sure why - perhaps because he was the older twin. Mengele made several operations on Tibi. One surgery on his spine left my brother paralyzed. He could not walk anymore. Then they took out his sexual organs. After the fourth operation, I did not see Tibi anymore. I cannot tell you how I felt. It is impossible to put into words how I felt. They had taken away my father, my mother, my two older brothers - and now, my twin ..." (http://www.auschwitz.dk/Mengele/id17.htm)

3 Comments:

Blogger Unknown said...

Citing the Nazi research gives us a difficult paradox. Do we completely ignore the possibly biased, unethical research done by the same people committing hate crimes against millions of people? Or do we cite the research for its plausible scientific validity, and keep record of the terrible acts committed so that they never happen again?

I think it is necessary to cite Nazi research, but not for its scientific content. Whether or not the validity of these experiments has been proven, if we completely forget about these studies, there is the possibility that they may happen again. History repeats itself, and if we do not keep record of history, we will have no way of preventing it in the future.

1:41 PM  
Blogger Ami said...

I think that you make a good point that in citing Nazi research, you are keeping the horrible memory alive so as to prevent it from happening again. But I wonder in what types of documents is it appropriate to cite the Nazi research? For example, I definitely think Nazi documents should be sited in documentary type pieces to keep the memory alive, but I am not so sure if it belongs in scientific literature. I think that call would have to be made case by case to determine if the Nazi research was "good" or "bad" science.

12:26 AM  
Blogger Quinn said...

I almost feel that Mengele pampering the twins (giving them toys, etc) before treatment is more unethical than simply shuttling them directly into the lab. Because of this, he's kind of like the witch in Hansel and Gretel, who wants to fatten up all her victims to increase her own pleasure as she eats them. By luring the twins into a false sense of security and happiness, Mengele maximizes the emotional trauma of his victims; deception, hand in hand with torture, adds a whole other insidious element to the warped Nazi mix.

7:37 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home