Animal Instincts
While Prendick was stranded on Dr. Moreau’s island, he witnessed Dr. Moreau transform wild animals into human like creatures. These creatures followed rules requiring them to walk and talk like real humans. They obeyed these laws for fear of death, or even worse going to the House of Pain. Once Moreau had died, their whole belief system was gone. He had been a God like symbol; he gave them human life and had the power to take it away. Without him the laws no longer existed; they were free to act as they pleased without terrible consequences. Without the enforcement of the laws, their animal instincts soon returned. The Dog Man followed Prendick around the island like a lost puppy while the Hyaena-Swine tried to attack and kill him. They all reverted back to walking on all fours, stopped talking and began killing for food. But this wasn’t the only change, without human interaction and law Prendick became more animal like as well. He describes his appearence he said, “My hair grew long, and became matted together, I am told that even now my eyes have a strange brightness, a swift alertness of movement” (131). He resembled the animals, he had that wildness to his eyes that he found curious in animals when he first arrived on the island. After he returned to the human world, he couldn’t even interact with people. He was different, “[He] was almost as queer to men as [he] had been to the Beast People” (138). All living things have animals like instincts, humans just do a better job at repressing them. The law is the reason for acting civilized, without it we aren’t too different then animals.
4 Comments:
I definitely agree that the law causes humans to repress their instincts; however, this is not always a good thing. Yes, using intelligence to override and repress some instincts is good and makes us more civilized; however, repressing other instincts can be detrimental to our health. For example, it is human instinct to dislike bitter substances such as alcohol, because they are harmful to the body. It is also instinct to only eat what we need to satisfy our hunger. However, we sometimes override this instinct when we force ourselves to finish a meal because we feel guilty about wasting food. Another instinct is to stretch in the morning, many neck and back pains can be prevented simply by stretching tight muscles. These are just some ways that society has expanded repression of instincts to include instincts that are beneficial to our health.
I completely agree with your ideas of humans and animal instinct. I was trying to get at this same point in my post. What would happen if the social norms of society were relaxed? Would our "animal instincts" return? I think they would gradually. I don't know how far people would revert to their animal past. I would like to think that humans would never revert to killing one another. But, after multiple generations of relaxed laws, who knows....
I'm really glad that you posted on this topic. It's actually quite interesting to think what would happen in our own society if laws were no longer enforced. Personally I think that our animal instincts would take over and our society would probably crumble. I think just having a few unstable individuals would corrupt society and make it difficult to live 'civilized' lives. Although I would also like to hope that humans would not revert to killing one another like Ami, but I believe that when one kills and is not punished then others will resort to their level and do the same. I kind of see this as a chain reaction. It's really sort of sad how our animal instincts can only be repressed by a system of rules and laws.
The discussion of law in a framework of suppression of animal instincts and promotion of civilized human behavior seems to me to be highly anthropocentric. Humans are animals, our behavior is not unique, only more pronounced in some areas and less in others. Any social animal has some rudimentary form of what we might call law, where different individuals cooperate in order to further the greater good of the group, and in doing so help themselves. In general there is some form of social hierarchy where some activities are taboo and others are encouraged as helpful. Thus I believe the true categories of behavior should not be animal versus human but individualistic versus social.
Post a Comment
<< Home